Please Wait...

Loyal to the Pledge

Sheikh Qassem: March 14 Part of American-“Israeli” Project

Sheikh Qassem: March 14 Part of American-“Israeli” Project
folder_openLebanon access_time14 years ago
starAdd to favorites

Local Editor

In a ceremony addressing Hizbullah's lawyers, Hizbullah Deputy Secretary General His Eminence Sheikh Naim Qassem tackled several issues including the 2000 liberation of Lebanon, the Palestinian-"Israeli" conflict, the Obama latest speech on the Middle East as well as the Lebanese internal situation and the government formation.

"Israel" to be removed:

Sheikh Naim Qassem, confirmed that the " 25th of May set grounds for the removal of the occupation from sea to river, and that "Israel" is after 63 years unable to secure its stability and expansion since it is passing through an inexperienced state of confusion".
Hizbullah Deputy-SG asked "If Egypt, with "Camp David", resists normalization, how would it be after the fall of Hosni Mubarak? If the Palestinian division formed a passage way for biting Palestine, what would the scene be after the reconciliation that stunned "Israel" regardless of its size and borders? If the Liberation in 2000 was so resounding and impressive, how was the "Israeli" defeat in July 2006 war which caused a direct damage within the entity and in the deterrence Zionist ability i.e. in the depth, the existence, and the strength of "Israel"?"
Qassem averred that "the region will not rest as long as "Israel" exists since the factor's of "Israel's" existence are factors that destroy the region that will not rest as "Israel" continues to exist it makes dissension, intervenes, and will lure the international community against our region to their advantage."

Obama's Speech:

Commenting on Obama's speech, Qassem viewed that "America wants clearly what Obama said: the United States' major interest in the region is to fight terrorism, to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, and to support the security "of Israel" in the peace process," adding that "these three things mean: facing terrorism, launching US hands by killing, changing and crashing systems and doing what it wants under the title "the fight against terrorism, and supporting the security "of "Israel", and this means that the "Israel" takes what it wants."
Qassem described Obama's speech as "a colonial speech that emphasizes the fundamentals of America in the equation of the new Middle East, and in US attempts to install the Israeli entity against the people will ".

14 March is an "Israeli" project:

On the same side, Sheikh Qassem reassured that "with the presence of resistance and its readiness, great hopes are set in sake of protecting Lebanon and liberating Palestine," wondering: "did not the resistance land liberate the Lebanese land?"
"Lebanon and the region today are in front of two projects: a US-"Israeli" project and another resistance and independence project. Clearly, March 14 group is part of the American-"Israeli" project, their fight is not against the "Israeli" enemy, their calculations are focused against the resistance, and their shooting is towards on Syria. They wish to end Hizbullah on the "Israeli" hands, and "Wiki leaks" is a witness on the July war. They were used within the framework of the Special Court and false witnesses as part of trying to hit the other project resembled by the resistance and the opposition...The 14 March statements are the same as the American and "Israeli" statements, the form one project. "Qassem clarified.

The Government:

The Deputy Secretary-General of Hizbullah addressed the group of March 14 by saying: "If you are against this project, take opposing positions that are in contrary with this project. In return, the resistance project of is a project of the facing, and being free to take decisions without pressure of any one on us."

He concluded that "our responsibility is to accomplish the formation of the government within a political vision that regards "Israel" as an enemy and the resistance as a demand. Our duty is to build good relations with Syria, and to preserve our independence with non-exclusivity, and the time available to the government is not open. There must be some sacrifices because the composition is in the interest of us all. "

 


Comments