- Home
- ISLAMIC RESISTANCE
- SECRETARY-GENERAL
-
Full Speeches
- Speeches-2000
- Speeches-2006
- Speeches-2007
- Speeches-2008
- Speeches-2009
- Speeches-2010
- Speeches-2011
- Speeches-2012
- Speeches-2013
- Speeches-2014
- Speeches-2015
- Speeches-2016
- Speeches-2017
- Speeches-2018
- Speeches-2019
- Speeches-2020
- Speeches-2021
- Speeches-2022
- Speeches-2023
- Speeches-2024
- Speeches-2025
- Speeches-2026
- Speech-Reports
- SG
-
Full Speeches
- Voices
- Ten Day Dawn
- The Biggest Crime
- Martyr Leaders
"Israel" is indeed 51st US State!
Source: Huffington Post, 07-02-2009
By Melissa Rossi
I'd thought it would just be a breezy Friday afternoon, when I clicked on today's post of M.J. Rosenberg, here on Huffington Post.
Director of Policy for the "Israel" Policy Forum, Mr. Rosenberg's blog entry concerns the upcoming "Israeli" election -- and he tells us the outcome is "really not our business." After all, he blithely notes, "As Americans, our job is to promote policies that are best for America, and for Israel."
There weren't comments when I started reading -- but by the time I read through his post and hit the reply button, there were already five comments and more pending. All of them saying the same thing -- no, Mr. Rosenberg -- our job is to promote policies that are best for America. PERIOD.
I am truly alarmed at the idea that "Israel" is indeed our 51st state -- falling, apparently between Indiana and Kansas -- but this idea is fairly entrenched in US foreign policy. After all, unbeknownst to most Americans, "Israel" -- an affluent country -- receives more US foreign aid than ANY other country in the world -- and the bulk of it goes for arms, a result of the 1979 Camp David Agreement that brought "Israeli"-Egyptian (so-called) peace, as I note in this entry.
Thus, everytime "Israel" makes a military move, it reflects on the US -- since they're using our freebie arms, as I note here.
The neocons who dominated both the Bush administrations, son's and father's, adopted the idea that what's good for "Israel" is good for the US, and there are those that argue that in fact our 2003 march into Iraq was more about conquering a threat to "Israel" than destroying a threat to the US.
And certainly, if "Israel" makes a move on Iran -- which remains a distinct possibility whoever wins the election -- and perhaps even before, as I discuss here -- it will not only reflect on the US yet again, it may pull us directly or indirectly into the ugliest war we've yet seen in the Middle East.
So, sorry, Mr. Rosenberg, it is our business who wins the elections in "Israel" -- nevertheless, "Israel" is not our latest state. And Mr. Rosenberg, I will be happy to debate you on this issue is any forum you name.
-- Melissa Rossi is the author of What Every American Should Know about the Middle East
Comments
- Related News
France’s Hollande in Qatar for Warplane Deal
11 years ago
Iraq Police Dismantles Al-Qaeda Protest Site
12 years ago
